VIDIA NAIPAUL
THE NAME FOR
LITERARY EXCELLENCE
Section 2
December 20, 2000
Pages 12, 13
A name that towers over those of most of the writers writing in
English today is the name of this week’s person of the century – Vidia
Naipaul. In the view of eminent critics
all the world over, this is the stamp of excellence that Trinidad and Tobago
has put upon the literary world.
Vidiaha
Surajprasad Naipaul was born at Chaguanas on August 17, 1932. Alert from his earliest days he won a
college exhibition to Queen’s Royal College in the opening months of 1944 when
he was not quite 12.
Those
were years when his father, Seepersad Naipaul, worked at the Trinidad
Guardian as a journalist and as a would-be author, producing, interestingly
enough, memorable little stories reflecting Trinidad life.
Of
course, readers were not to know that from this source would flow the spring of
the excellence mentioned before, that this quiet literary talent would blossom
out through the son and flourish in the magnificent way that it has. All that one would have noticed, if one had
followed the academic career of Vidia in his QRC days, was the consistently
high level of work he turned out.
The
academic excellence was but a step on the ladder of realising his secret dream,
that of being a writer. In his fifth
year at QRC (1949) he had the distinction of winning an Island Scholarship,
which enabled him to enter Oxford University in 1950.
Naturally,
choosing English Language as his discipline he graduated with a Bachelor of
Arts degree, and from Oxford he went to the next logical place, the British
Broadcasting Corporation in London, where he worked as joint editor of one of
their programmes, “Caribbean Voices.”
(This
was a programme of verse and prose broadcast from the BBC to the Caribbean as
part of the segment: “Calling the West Indies.” As a matter of coincidence, the programme was directed by Henry
Swanzy, who had greatly admired Seepersad Naipaul and had used his work on the
programme.)
Although
most writers seem to dream their dreams from childhood, there is not much
evidence of Naipaul’s obsession with the craft until, without warning, he burst
on the scene in 1957.
In
fact, it appears that he had seriously launched into writing by 1955, and in
1956 he went to one of the new publishers in London with two novels. This publisher, Andre Deutsch, immediately
recognised the great talent before him.
Years later he told another of his writers: “I knew he had what it took
to be a writer of distinction, and I felt that even if those two books did not
make money for me, there would be other books to come which would do it because
I knew that he had it.”
The
first of these two books was published in 1957 and was called The Mystic
Masseur. The second was
published a year later and was called The Suffrage of Elvira.
These
two books alone established Vidia Naipaul in Caribbean writing, and could be
considered the springboard for the “unleashing” of so many exceptional books by
this prolific writer.
His
pen never rested, for although he had two novels published in two years – 1957
and 1958 – another was to come in 1959.
This is the book of separate but interlocking stories set in one
particular location: Miguel Street.
It
was in 1960, however, that this already celebrated writer produced the novel
that some people still cite as his best work.
It was The House for Mr. Biswas, a tale of the life and
times of a dedicated family man of Chaguanas, probably the most autobiographical
novel that Naipaul has written.
Following
A House for Mr. Biswas, Vidia showed his versatility by writing a hard-hitting
work of non-fiction entitled The Middle Passage, and this has clearly
been the most controversial West Indian book, stirring up the proverbial
“hornet’s nest” of criticism.
The
criticism was based largely on statements made by the author which were seen as
being anti-Caribbean, and anti-Third World; a notion that the author could not
see anything good coming from the West Indies.
Anyway,
this was his first venture into non-fiction, and therefore the first time he
was speaking through himself and not through fictional characters. Which meant he had to stand up by the
opinions expressed, some of which were very unpopular.
The
Middle Passage referred to in that book was the middle passage of the slave
ships, and Naipaul, dealing with the society created by this event, analysed
all the complexities resulting from the situation. As was said, his vision of it did not please everyone. Yet, even in this controversial book his
critics saw a work of great accomplishment.
THE NAME OF
LITERARY EXCELLENCE
December 27, 2000
Pages 28, 29
In
1963, Naipaul again broke new ground.
This time the book was Mr. Stone and the Knight’s Companion, a book very
unusual for a West Indian writer in that the setting and background was
entirely English. The critics in the
West Indies must have been taken aback by this because they did not say much
about it, but this quiet, whimsical story of Mr. Stone was warmly praised by
English critics and Naipaul received the Hawthornden Prize for this work..
If
the Mr. Stone novel of 1963 was the case of a West Indian writing of the
English scene, then in the year before that, one saw the writer move even
further away: a West Indian living in England, writing of India, his ancestral
land.
It
was his ancestral land but he was not going to deal with it from a point of
view of false loyalty and the expected sentiment. And he certainly was not going to see it through rose-coloured
lenses. He had visited India on a
sightseeing and fact-finding mission, and he was clearly disappointed and disillusioned. His assessment of the visit was summed up in
the title he gave to the book: An Area of Darkness.
This
book won Naipaul many more enemies than friends, and some looked upon him as a
cold, diffident writer. In Trinidad,
especially, many Indians saw him as one who betrayed the motherland. But as was seen, it was not the first time
he had paid a high price for being honest and truthful according to his own
vision.
Far
from being intimidated he again hit out, this time through a work called “The
Mimic Men”. It was interesting that
what he was attacking was not far away, not a distant land, but the society
right here at home.
This
book, published in 1967, set out to show how people in this post-colonial
society have been conditioned and condemned by their upbringing and
experiences, to a life of mimicry.
Although the book was criticized and repudiated by “patriotic”
Trinidadians, it has always been recognised as touching the core of truth.
In
the same year, 1967, this prolific author published a book of short stories
called A Flag on the Island.
Two
years later (1969), Vidia Naipaul made yet another departure. He went into the discipline of History for
the first time, and the scope, the accuracy, and depth of his work surprised
the critics. His story was the story of
the fascination of the explorers of the “New World” with the legend of El
Dorado, and the part El Dorado played as the focal point in the history of this
region of the Americas. This book was
the much appreciated, The Loss of El Dorado.
However,
it was with the following book that Naipaul hit upon his most spectacular
success up to that time. In financial
terms it could be called “The Gain of El Dorado,” for it won him the $24,000
Booker’s Literary Prize. This was In
a Free State, published in 1971.
After
The Guerillas came India – a Wounded Civilization, in 1977; then The
Return of Eva Peron, then A Bend in the River, in 1979.
Among
the Believers,
appeared in 1981, and Finding the Centre, in 1984.
He
produced The Enigma of Arrival in 1987, A Turn in the South, in
1989, and to start the decade of the 1990s he published India – A Thousand
Mutineies Now. Two of his other
works of the 1990s were A Way in the World (1994) and Beyond
Belief, (1998).
And
it is almost beyond belief that this man of the century who began his career in
1957 with The Mystic Masseur, should have, in the span of 43 years,
consistently produced the best works in West Indian writing – touching on
history, philosophy, politics, and religion; apart from the books which came
from the mainstream of his rich creative powers.
From
a literary point of view, no tribute to Vidia Naipaul can border on the
excessive, for he has enriched the literary world, thus given us a permanent
place in the sun.
It
seems to have taken a long time for a work of this master to be the subject of
a motion picture, but now that The Mystic Masseur is about to be filmed,
it enhances the success story.
And
fittingly enough, this is the last in the series about the outstanding men and
women of the 20th Century in Trinidad and Tobago. This Wednesday column, which ends today, the
last Wednesday of the century, was meant to act as an inspiration to the young,
who have the shaping of our 21st Century in their hands.